[Home ] [Archive]    
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Publishing Policies::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Review Policies
:: Volume 11, Issue 3 (July - August 2016) ::
IJNR 2016, 11(3): 37-47 Back to browse issues page
Critical Appraisal of the Randomized Controlled Trial Studies Reports in Nursing Journals
S Moosavi , C Rohani *
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran, Iran , camelia.rohani@sbmu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (7805 Views)

Introduction: Randomized controlled trial studies provide substantial evidence for evaluation of the effectiveness of nursing interventions. Evidence-based practice is the ultimate goal of nursing and requires integration of the best research documents to present high quality health care.

Objective: This descriptive cross-sectional study is aimed to determine methodological quality of randomized controlled trials reports in the Iranian Nursing Journals with the Persian and English language with the Oxford quality scoring system or the Jadad Scale.

Methods: Searching for nursing randomized controlled trial articles which were indexed in various databases, including SID, Magiran, Irandoc, Iranmedex and Google Scholar were done by these Persian and English keywords, randomized controlled trial and clinical trial in combination with Nursing.  After applying the inclusion criteria and removing irrelevant articles, only 42 articles were left to review. They were assessed by the Oxford quality scoring system or the Jadad Scale.

Results: The mean of the methodological quality of the selected articles was 1.38±1.07 based on the three direct questions for bias control in the Jadad Scale (minimum favorable mean is 3 points). From 42 selected articles only 31% applied a random allocation with low bias, 9.6% of the articles applied double-blind or single-blind methods during the sampling. Attrition was only mentioned in 7.1% of the articles.

Conclusion: Considering the vital role of randomized controlled trial studies during the evidence-based performance in nursing is important. Any weaknesses in the methodology and inadequate reporting of the results could lead to bias and the wrong conclusions in the study. Based on the findings, it is obvious that there is a need to improve the quality of reporting of the nursing randomized controlled trials in the Iranian Nursing Journals with the Persian and English language, especially in the methodology part.

Keywords: Randomized controlled trial, clinical trial, nursing, Oxford quality scoring system, Jadad Scale
Full-Text [PDF 269 kb]   (2562 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Community Health Nursing | Subject: nursing
Received: 2016/08/20 | Accepted: 2016/08/20 | Published: 2016/08/20
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moosavi S, Rohani C. Critical Appraisal of the Randomized Controlled Trial Studies Reports in Nursing Journals . IJNR 2016; 11 (3) :37-47
URL: http://ijnr.ir/article-1-1769-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 3 (July - August 2016) Back to browse issues page
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4652