[Home ] [Archive]    
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Publishing Policies::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Review Policies
:: Volume 6, Issue 21 (Summer 2011) ::
IJNR 2011, 6(21): 15-28 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of the effect of clinical evaluation by two methods: Portfolio and popular, on satisfaction of nurse students
Masomeh Latifi * , Marzieh Shaban , Alireza Nikbakht , Abbas Mehran , Zohreh Parsa yekta
tehran faculty of nursing , @razi.tums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (50883 Views)
Introduction: Clinical evaluation is one of the important factors in nursing education, and there are some difficulties in evaluation of clinical skills, representing more practical and effective ways in this field is the topic of many researches. So, in this research we designed a lesson plan based on portfolio evaluation method and used it in nurse student's clinical courses. Then we compared their satisfaction from clinical evaluation with popular method. Methods: In this experimental research, students in fifth semester of nursing at Tehran University of Nursing and Midwifery are participated. These students were divided into subgroups of 7 and 8. Each of these subgroups passed the clinical probationary in cardiac unit. After explaining the research goals, these subgroups were put in two research groups randomly. In portfolio group (n=21) students evaluated by using portfolio method and portfolio evaluation tool. And in other group (n=20), popular form of clinical evaluation in university was used. Both groups answered the satisfaction questionnaire in last day. Content validity and reliability of questionnair was tested. Data analyzed by SPSS software and with Chi square, Fisher Exact, Mann Whitney, Wilcoxon and spearman's rho tests. Results: Findings showed that students had 21.5±1.36 years of old and most of them was female and married. Satisfaction in portfolio group was meaningfully greater than popular group in three aspects: alignment of subjects in evaluation method and form with clinical course objects (P=0.04), creating interest and motivation for participation of students in learning (P=0.005), motivating students to use books and other scientific references (P=0.01). Satisfaction of popular group from fairness of evaluation method was greater than portfolio group (P=0.017). There was no meaningful results in other aspects. Conclusion: More satisfaction in some aspects from portfolio method represents acceptance of new active methods of learning and evaluation by students. so, using portfolio as one of the best method of clinical evaluation in nursing and doing more researches advised.
Keywords: Clinical evaluation, portfolio, satisfaction, nurse student
Full-Text [PDF 728 kb]   (139 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Nursing Education | Subject: nursing
Received: 2011/08/2 | Published: 2011/07/15
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

latifi M, shaban M, nikbakht A, mehran A, parsa yekta Z. Comparison of the effect of clinical evaluation by two methods: Portfolio and popular, on satisfaction of nurse students. IJNR 2011; 6 (21) :15-28
URL: http://ijnr.ir/article-1-837-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 21 (Summer 2011) Back to browse issues page
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710